Despite what many people think, generic drugs are perfectly safe and effective. Some patients think that they must be inferior because they cost less. That simply isn't true. There's a very good reason why they cost less and it has nothing to do with quality of product.
When a pharmaceutical company patents a new drug, they get exclusive rights to market that drug for a certain number of years. That gives them time to recoup their R&D costs which typically runs $2-$3 billion.
Once that patent runs out, other companies may start manufacturing and selling their versions of the same medicine. They don't have the $3 billion upfront cost to worry about so they can charge a whole lot less. The actual production of the medicine doesn't really cost that much, literally pennies per dose in most cases.
So the brand name drug might cost the pharmacy $5/pill and they sell it for $6. The generic might cost $0.25 and they sell it for $2. This also explains why some pharmacies are able to do things like WalMart's $4 generic plan. They can give you 30 pills for $4 and still make a profit because they are paying next to nothing for those pills because they buy in huge quantities. Some pharmacies even "sell" certain meds for free just to get customers into the store.
So is there any time when a generic isn't a good idea? There can be. Certain medications have what is called a narrow therapeutic range, meaning fairly precise dosing is important. This is true for things like thyroid medication and certain blood thinners. Even a 5-10% dose variation from batch to batch or company to company could be clinically significant so you should discuss this with your doctor.
I have encountered times over the years where someone just found that a generic wasn't working well for them, and sometimes it was a change from one generic to another. I handle those on a case by case basis as some people are more sensitive to the minor variance that can exist.
Overall, though, I prescribe generics whenever possible to reduce the cost to both the patients and the overall healthcare system. And I'm certainly not alone as about 80% of all prescriptions are for generic medicines.
When a pharmaceutical company patents a new drug, they get exclusive rights to market that drug for a certain number of years. That gives them time to recoup their R&D costs which typically runs $2-$3 billion.
Once that patent runs out, other companies may start manufacturing and selling their versions of the same medicine. They don't have the $3 billion upfront cost to worry about so they can charge a whole lot less. The actual production of the medicine doesn't really cost that much, literally pennies per dose in most cases.
So the brand name drug might cost the pharmacy $5/pill and they sell it for $6. The generic might cost $0.25 and they sell it for $2. This also explains why some pharmacies are able to do things like WalMart's $4 generic plan. They can give you 30 pills for $4 and still make a profit because they are paying next to nothing for those pills because they buy in huge quantities. Some pharmacies even "sell" certain meds for free just to get customers into the store.
So is there any time when a generic isn't a good idea? There can be. Certain medications have what is called a narrow therapeutic range, meaning fairly precise dosing is important. This is true for things like thyroid medication and certain blood thinners. Even a 5-10% dose variation from batch to batch or company to company could be clinically significant so you should discuss this with your doctor.
I have encountered times over the years where someone just found that a generic wasn't working well for them, and sometimes it was a change from one generic to another. I handle those on a case by case basis as some people are more sensitive to the minor variance that can exist.
Overall, though, I prescribe generics whenever possible to reduce the cost to both the patients and the overall healthcare system. And I'm certainly not alone as about 80% of all prescriptions are for generic medicines.
Comment