Hi, this is my first post. I just sold my 2006 Mustang V6. I did it for a few reasons, such as it was a money pit (unreliable), guzzled gas, and given the state of our economy, and where it might be going, I decided to get into a practical car that would cost less to run/maintain.
My knee jerk reaction was to just shop for a nice used car not too old, with low miles, but part of me is thinkingt a different angle, and it is this angle that I want to run by you here, as I need a reality check:
I'm thinking a brand new Toyota Yaris Liftback. It can be had for $13,300 out the door, including all taxes, distination charges, registration, etc. It gets mid/high 30's mpg combined driving, and I drive about 60% highway. I plan to keep the car until it drops, so since I drive around 24,000 miles/year, the car is expected to last me around 12 years. I have this idea that I can get 300,000 miles out of it if I take care of it.
My thinking is that since I'll own the car it's entire life, the hit in depreciation in the beginning will be relieved somewhat by keeping the car it's entire life, as opposed to replacing it every few years like typical Americans would.
I'm thinking that in the long run it might prove more reliable then buying a used car without knowing how good or bad the prior owner/s treated it.
I'm planning to do all my own maintenence except for complex repairs, of which I hope to have little or none of throughout the life of the car.
Another way of explaining my approach would be to ask myself the question: How many miles am I buying? That answer would be 300,000.
So if I need to buy 300,000 miles, would it cost me less and be more reliable if I buy a used care every 50,000 to 100,000 miles, or one car for 300,000?
Ok, folks, so does my strategy make any sense, in regard to (1) saving money, (2) going for very high reliability?
More info: I'm paying cash. Car will be manual transmission.
Please straighten me out, and I have a thick hide too ;-)
Thanks!
My knee jerk reaction was to just shop for a nice used car not too old, with low miles, but part of me is thinkingt a different angle, and it is this angle that I want to run by you here, as I need a reality check:
I'm thinking a brand new Toyota Yaris Liftback. It can be had for $13,300 out the door, including all taxes, distination charges, registration, etc. It gets mid/high 30's mpg combined driving, and I drive about 60% highway. I plan to keep the car until it drops, so since I drive around 24,000 miles/year, the car is expected to last me around 12 years. I have this idea that I can get 300,000 miles out of it if I take care of it.
My thinking is that since I'll own the car it's entire life, the hit in depreciation in the beginning will be relieved somewhat by keeping the car it's entire life, as opposed to replacing it every few years like typical Americans would.
I'm thinking that in the long run it might prove more reliable then buying a used car without knowing how good or bad the prior owner/s treated it.
I'm planning to do all my own maintenence except for complex repairs, of which I hope to have little or none of throughout the life of the car.
Another way of explaining my approach would be to ask myself the question: How many miles am I buying? That answer would be 300,000.
So if I need to buy 300,000 miles, would it cost me less and be more reliable if I buy a used care every 50,000 to 100,000 miles, or one car for 300,000?
Ok, folks, so does my strategy make any sense, in regard to (1) saving money, (2) going for very high reliability?
More info: I'm paying cash. Car will be manual transmission.
Please straighten me out, and I have a thick hide too ;-)
Thanks!
Comment